Presumption of validity in Canadian patent law

Canadian patent law
Patentability
Patentable subject-matter Novelty Non-obviousness Utility Sufficiency of disclosure Presumption of validity
Infringement
Patent infringement Defences and remedies
Legal texts
Patent Act Manual of Patent Office Practice (MOPOP)
Governmental organization
Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO)
Categories
Canadian patent law Canadian patent case law
v t e

The presumption of validity refers to the fact that, once a patent has been issued, the courts will presume that it is valid, unless there is evidence to the contrary.

Canada

Section 43(2) of the Patent Act^[1] creates the presumption of validity:

After the patent is issued, it shall, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, be valid and avail the patentee and the legal representatives of the patentee for the term mentioned in section 44 or 45, whichever is applicable.

In Diversified Products Corp v Tye-Sil Corp, the Federal Court of Appeal held that the presumption of validity merely gives rise to an evidential burden on a balance of probabilities.

References